The Frigs and Frags around OpenDocument
ᅠ
Being shaken up and down and back and forth made me feel a little bit like OpenDocument Format could “feel” these days. Just try to imagine yourself how an ISO standard feels and let’s pretend we never had that conversation… Anyway.You read the news just like I did; a more or less complete press review is here, thanks to Sam Hiser. The least I can say is that I am disappointed by the OpenDocument Foundation, not because they’re switching to a different format, but because of the media effect their announcement unleashed. As a matter of fact, I think that I read pretty much every opinion in the press about it: the Foundation is a bunch of traitors, they could have a point and, wait a minute, aren’t they just three guys in a garage?
ᅠ
My beef with the OpenDocument is that they really did hurt the Open Standards cause by coming out in public about their new orientation, and they indirectly helped the spreading of Fear, Uncertainty and Doubt by Microsoft and the press about ODF. That being said, I wish them good luck with their new endeavours (although I’m more than a bit skeptical about the “Compound Document Format” at this stage) and believe that as much as they and I disagree about several topics, they are in favor of Open Standards.
ᅠ
But let’s take a closer look to the situation with ODF itself, and leave the Foundation’s claims aside for a moment. The Foundation may be gone, but ODF itself is doing quite well and is gaining new (mighty) contributors. Yes, Google is siding with ODF. So long for the odd and quite sad feast of business and technology merging happening between Novell and Microsoft. Microsoft keeps thundering and lenifying about patents at the same time, but Novell seems to be on the verge of no-return. Here and there, its engineers keep bragging about how great OOXML is, and its marketing message is all about merging and “interoperability”. Is that what the customers need? Customers need things like Samba, or virtualization, but they don’t need to have Microsoft selling them Linux. It’s precisely what they’re running away from.
ᅠ
ᅠ
Back to the OASIS. We’re about to publish the 1.2 version of ODF, and this will be submitted first as an OASIS standard and then will take the way to the ISO. Speaking about which, I have heard here and there that the JTC-1’s SC 34 of the ISO (the group in charge of OOXML and ODF among other things) is being paralyzed by the number of new “P” countries that discovered they had a passion for OOXML but fell short of being competent on the other standard proposals. What I see coming though, because I witnessed this at the Afnor, is that Microsoft and its proxies will do anything in their power to stall ODF 1.2 at at the ISO and inside the national standards orgaizations. The reason is simple: If their objectives was to have two standards, ODF certainly could have led a life of its own and that would not have been a concern to Redmond. But now that the situation becomes trickier for OOXML, a vested interest in severely harming ODF seems to become more prominent.
Expect lots of surprizes, laughs, scandals, and dirty tricks in 2008. The spin doctors are already at work. Stay tuned…
ᅠ
Leave a Reply