50 Million downloads and still counting

26 03 2009


These days are occasions to celebrate, both for the ODF and OpenOffice.org communities. Yesterday was the Document Freedom Day, celebrating the liberation of documents through open standards such as ODF. This global initative attempts to let people know about the importance of true Open Standards and why they matter in their every day life. Also the Document Freedom Day was the occasion for the Sun OpenOffice.org team to get involved with this initiative. I wasn’t there but I think they liked it. In other ODF news Rob Weir now has the most famous aggregator on ODF. And he might be right: The ODF planet is really an in-depth feedreader for ODF news.

But the news do not stop here. OpenOffice.org has reached beyond 50 million downloads and we are still counting. The community continues to grow. Recently, we signed up the Pashto Native-Language and hope it will help people in Afghanistan break the digital divide in this war-riddled country. In fact these news almost got hidden by the quite impressive list of new features expected in the upcoming 3.1. (yes, antialiasing is coming in the 3.1. Promised.)

Enjoy the beginning of the Spring!



A Culture of Idiots

18 03 2009

Dear readers,

This is not a regular post. In France we always had had a strange institution  called the Ministry of Culture. I qualify it as strange because although most French people never thought it was not an obvious part of the government abroad, having a Ministry of Culture is sometimes seen as an useless and costly toy in several parts of the world. Many French people sometimes note half-jokingly that the reason why we are pretty much the only nation to have a distinct, autonomous Ministry of Culture is that France has an important cultural heritage, and an important cultural influence. 

Or so we thought. These days the Minister of Culture, a super-duper Agrégé de Lettres has decided that our culture was to bow before its new masters, namely the record labels and decaying industry. In her great wisdom, our glorious Minister, the Salt of our soil, our Doctrix Ignoranta, has decided that anyone could be convicted by a private court of illegal music downloading, that the punishment would be the banning of culprits from the Internet and of course the payment of penalties. And in order for citizens not to be suspected, they will have to pay for proprietary software (running only on Windows) that may exempt them from outright suscpicion by default (and yet that’s not even clear). She has achieved what centuries of invasions, wars, and disruptions of various kind hadn’t: To bring the value of culture to the one of mundane objects. And while she is actually proud of that  (”to download music illegally is like stealing in a bakery” is what she keeps hammering), she has so far refused any kind of discussion.

I must say that this new legislation will have some advantage: Travelling abroad will be much easier for French. From now on, we will not have to boast anything coming from our country. Our Government has taken Britney Spears to the level of Charles Baudelaire and Molière and is trying hard to put restrictions on the Internet similar to the ones existing in the P.R.C.

No wonder the same government thinks our National Education system has to be deeply amended: One of its members is the living evidence of it!

More seriously, I do think this new legislation is dangerous and goes against every democratic principles. This government and the record labels  will not tell me what I have to do with my computer. Let me be very clear on this. 

Unfortunately what is happening right now at the French Parliament is very much telling of the French society: A country with decaying elites trying to impose their own citizens the constant telling of the same farce: the myth of France, the everlasting Grande Nation, its Grande Culture, and above all, its own version of American Idol.



Thirty years old and still no Tom-Tom…

3 03 2009

HADOPI - Le Net en France : black-out

Today I am thirty. And today, I have decided I would post a blog that would not be different from the my other posts. How’s that for genuine originality? So today’s topic will be a round-up of news on OpenDocument Format (ODF). It has been a long time I haven’t updated this area.

 

  • ODF 1.2 is well underway. The arrival of a flurry of new members inside the ODF Technical Committee who have illustrated themselves as proponents of OOXML is a bit fun to watch I must say. But I have to command the general serenity of the Committee and its chairs, Rob Weir and Michael Brauer for their quiet and effective management of the proceedings. I think the only thing that is to be hoped for is that we can finish the completion of this ODF sub-version. Also, and of some interest, I can only recommend the reading of the archives of the Committee’s discussions online where interesting concepts on extensions and conformance are being discussed.

  • Some « lighter » news but as serious: the future of ODF does not just depend on the OASIS ODF Technical Committee. It depends on you. You are encouraged to provide ideas for the future versions of ODF « ODF-Next » . The Committee has wanted this to be inclusive of everyone’s participation as explained here.

  • We did know that at some point in time, Microsoft Office would support ODF. It seems the wait is almost over these days. You will recall I was originally very supportive of the idea of Microsoft Office natively supporting ODF; then, I took some time reading the fine print and I grew a bit wary of what the Microsoft engineers were saying about the limits their implementation of ODF would be constrained to. At this point in time we do not have the Service Pack 2 of Microsoft Office 2007. What we do know however, is a couple of things that got me thinking: ODF support will only be available in the latest, patched version of Microsoft Office 2007. It will have some limitations and the feature will not be put prominently in the hands of the users, so to speak. I wonder why ODF shouldn’t be Microsoft Office’s default format or if the default configuration would be more effective with an icon on the user interface. After all, ODF is an ISO standard and people, governments, businesses demand it (at this stage it’s not even clear if OOXML was even requested by anyone who was not already part of Ecma and had vested interests in siding on with Microsoft…), so why not make that jump?

  • This also got me thinking: ODF support in MS Office is a good idea. Don’t get me wrong on this. I wish however were extended to other products of the Microsoft stack, such as Sharepoint, Microsoft Dynamics and even Microsoft Internet Explorer. Why? I do not advocate this strategic move with ulterior motives of having Microsoft fail. Precisely not: The only way for Microsoft to survive is to embrace Open Standards, transparency and perhaps Open Source in some way. So let Microsoft do it the whole way. If the market demands ODF, let it have it and let it have a real choice, where Microsoft would actually be a compelling one for good. I am confident Microsoft folks are having some discussion on this internally. But there is at the very least two sides inside the company, and any attempt to play well with the Open Source Community (for the sake of not playing fair with the Free Software part of the community) is unfortunately matched by opposite and hostile moves.

  • Which brings me to the Microsoft vs. Tom-Tom case. This is one more story where software patents hamper innovation. Add to this the general timing of the case: Tom-Tom is an European company operating in the automotive industry. You can understand now why the European Union has to stand firmly by its automotive sector…







Close
E-mail It